Tag Archives: child protection

Emotional abuse and neglect

With many thanks to Dr Harriet Clompus, paediatric SpR with an interest in community paediatrics for summarising this core-info topic so neatly and usefully.

Emotional Neglect and Abuse

Core-info, a Cardiff university based research group, examines all areas of child abuse by systematically reviewing worldwide  literature and producing recommendations based on best evidence.  This is a useful resource for paediatricians, general practitioners, health visitors, nurses, social workers, educators.  Find all their reviews at www.core-info.cardiff.ac.uk.

Core-info have produced a leaflet in cooperation with National Society of Prevention of Cruelty against Children (NSCPCC) following a review in 2011 of the available literature on emotional neglect and abuse in children less than 6 years old.  The leaflet is available at NSCPCC resources at www.nspcc.org.uk/inform.  You can also subscribe to CASPAR a news service that signposts you to latest policy, practice and research in child protection.

Definitions of emotional neglect and emotional abuse vary, but all include persistent, harmful interaction with the child by the primary care-giver.

The Core-info/NSPCC leaflet reports one in 10 children in the UK experience severe neglect in childhood.  It uses the WHO definitions for emotional neglect and abuse. (World report on violence and health  (2002) page 60.  Edited by Krug et al)

‘Emotional neglect is the failure of a parent to provide for the emotional development of the child.’

Examples of emotional neglect include:-

–  Ignoring the child’s need to interact

–  Failing to express positive feelings to the child, showing no emotion in interactions with the child

– Denying the child opportunities for interacting and communicating with peers and adults.

‘Emotional abuse includes failure of a care-giver to provide an adequate and supportive environment and includes acts that have an adverse effect on the emotional health and development of a child.  Such acts include restricting a child’s movements, denigration, ridicule, threats and intimidation, discrimination, rejection and other non-physical forms of hostile treatment.’

Examples of emotional abuse include:-

–  Persistently telling a child they are worthless or unloved

–  Bullying a child or frequently making them frightened

– Persistently ridiculing, making fun of or criticising a child.

The core-info/NSCPCC leaflet categorises behaviour/interactions to be concerned about in three different age groups (it only gives data up to 6 years and on mother (not father or other caregiver) interaction, reflecting data collection in studies reviewed).  Attachment to mother is disordered and emotionally neglected children show typical pattern of initially passive and withdrawn and then hostile and disruptive behaviour and developmental delay especially in speech and language.

1) Infant (<12 months old)

  • Mother-child interaction:  mother insensitive and unresponsive to child’s needs.  Rarely speaks to child, describes them as irritating/demanding.  Failing to engage emotionally with child during feeds.  Child unconcerned when mother leaves and when mother returns, child avoids her or does not go to her for comfort.
  • Behaviour:  Quiet and passive child.  May demonstrate developmental delay within first year, particularly in speech and language (particularly if mother has had depression).

2) Toddlers (1-3 years old)

  • Mother-child interaction: More obvious that mother is unresponsive or does not respond appropriately to child (called ‘lacking attunement’).  Mother is often critical of child and ignores signals for help.  Child is angry and avoidant of their mother.
  • Emotionally neglected/abused children grow less passive and more aggressive and hostile, particularly with other children.  They show more memory deficits than other children, including physically abused children.

3) Children (3 -6 years)

  • Mother-child interaction: Mother offers little or no praise, rarely speaks to the child and shows less positive contact.  Mother is unlikely to reach out to the child to relieve distress and the child is unlikely to go to the mother for comfort.  Neglectful mothers are more likely to resort to physical punishment than other mothers.
  • Emotionally neglected children show more speech and language delay than physically abused children.  Girls show more language delay than boys.  Their behaviour is often disruptive (rated more disruptive by parents and teachers than physically abused children or controls). They show little creativity in their play, have difficulty interpreting others emotions and have poor interactions with other children.  They tend to be less likely to help others or expect help themselves.

 

Implications for practice:

–  All practitioners (gps, paediatricians, nursery nurses and teachers, health visitors etc)  need to consider emotional neglect and abuse when assessing a child’s welfare.  The longer a child is left in an emotionally neglectful or emotionally abusive environment, the greater the damage.  However intensive work with families to increase parental sensitivity to their child’s needs, can lead to improvements in child’s emotional development.

Important attachment disorders are recognisable in young infants and merit referral to professionals trained in infant mental health (Waltham forest has a Parent Infant Mental Health Service (PIMHS) which accepts referrals related to disordered attachment in children under 3 years.  PIMHS works with the mother and child to foster healthier attachment (the earlier in a child’s life this is done, the better the outcome).   Any health care professional can refer a family to PIMHS.  See paediatric pearls from May 2012 for more information:- www.paediatricpearls.co.uk/…/the-parent-infant-mental-health-service-pimhs

In older children (>3 years) it can be difficult to know when and where to refer.  Emotional neglect and abuse is by definition a persistent behaviour pattern, so cannot be diagnosed on the basis of one short consultation.  Concerns about parent-child interaction witnessed in a short consultation in A+E or GP surgery may trigger a health-visitor review to gather information, prior to a possible referral to social services.  Information should be sought from all those involved in the child’s care including nursery/school teachers.   If concerns around behaviour witnessed in A+E or GP surgery are severe, an immediate referral to social services may be appropriate.

Professionals should be able to recognise speech and language delay and refer appropriately.  See paediatric pearls from April 2012 www.paediatricpearls.co.uk/…/stages-of-normal-speech-development/.  Many of the features found in emotionally neglected and abused children may also be observed in those with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) or Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).  If a child is showing language delay and behavioural disruption they should be referred for a formal child development assessment (either in speech and communication clinic (SACC)  or child development clinic (CDC) – refer to Wood Street Child Development team in WF)

–  Consider risk factors – Core-info’s systematic review did not encompass ‘risk factors’ for emotional neglect and abuse.   However  it states that ‘many of these children live in homes where certain risk factors are present.  Namely – domestic abuse, maternal substance misuse, parental unemployment or mental health issues, an absence of a helpful supportive social network, lack of intimate emotional support and poverty’.

March 2013 up and running

Delayed sleep phase this month and chronotherapy which sounds like quite an undertaking.  Also a link to a new parent’s guide to picking up and talking about sexual abuse, links to handy recent uploads to the site, the BSACI guideline on allergic rhinitis and more banging on about vitamin D supplementation – please.

September 2012 newsletter!

Take a look at September 2012’s edition of Paediatric Pearls!  Safeguarding issues surrounding head and spinal injuries, simple motor tics, chronic fatigue syndrome, the new CATS website and some pointers to gems you might have missed from the last 3 years.  Do leave comments.

child abuse and head injuries

This summarises the Core-info leaflet on head and spinal injuries in children. Full details are available at www.core-info.cardiff.ac.uk.

**PLEASE REFER ALL SUSPECTED INFLICTED HEAD AND SPINAL INJURIES TO PAEDIATRICS **

Inflicted head injuries

  • can arise from shaking and/or impact
  • occurs most commonly in the under 2’s
  • are the leading cause of death among children who have been abused
  • survivors may have significant long term disabilities
  • must be treated promptly to minimise long term consequences
  • victims often have been subject to previous physical abuse

Signs of inflicted head injury

  • may be obvious eg. loss of consciousness, fitting, paralysis, irritability
  • can be more subtle eg. poor feeding, excessive crying, increasing OFC
  • particular features include retinal haemorrhages, rib fractures, bruising to the head and/or neck and apnoeas
  • also look for other injuries including bites, fractures, oral injuries

If inflicted head injury is suspected

  • a CT head, skull X-ray and/or MRI brain should be performed
  • neuro-imaging findings include subdural haemorrhages +/- subarachnoid haemorrhages (extradural haemorrhages are
    more common in non-inflicted injuries)
  • needs thorough examination including ophthalmology and skeletal survey
  • co-existing spinal injuries should be considered
  • any child with an unexplained brain injury need a full investigation eg. for metabolic and haematological conditions, before a diagnosis of abuse can be made

The following diagram comes from http://www.primary-surgery.org:

 

 

These CT images are from http://www.hawaii.edu/medicine/pediatrics/pemxray/v5c07.html:

 

EXTRADURAL (or epidural) haematoma

 

 

SUBDURAL haemorrhages in a 4 month old

SUBARACHNOID haemorrhage in a 14 month old

Neuro-imaging for inflicted brain injury should be performed in

  • any infant with abusive injuries
  • any child with abusive injuries and signs and symptoms of brain injury

Inflicted spinal injuries

  • come in 2 categories : neck injuries, and chest or lower back injuries
  • neck injuries are most common under 4 months
  • neck injuries are often associated with brain injury and/or retinal haemorrhages
  • chest or lower back injuries are most common in older toddlers over 9 months
  • if a spinal fracture is seen on X-ray or a spinal cord injury is suspected, an MRI should be performed

 

August 2012 PDF digest

August’s PDF only has 4 text boxes but with lots of information crammed into them and extra on the blog.  A great looking PDF on poisoning in children from one of our registrars, an article on stammering from another working with a speech and language therapist and an update on BTS pneumonia guidelines just in time for the winter.  Also a feature on Cardiff’s core info safeguarding work on the evidence behind different types of fractures.  Do leave comments…

Fractures in child abuse

Metaphyseal fractures, also known as a bucket handle, chip or corner fracture, occur at the growing end of the bone and only in children. Recent fractures are very difficult to see on x-ray and they are often not associated with any clinical sign of soft tissue swelling or bruising.  They may become more obvious radiographically after 11 to 14 days. They are thought to happen when the baby has been pulled or swung violently and the relatively weaker growing point of the bone breaks.  They have been noted to occur accidentally following birth injuries, following serial casting of talipes or as a consequence of appropriate physiotherapy to newborn babies. (Source: Core-info leaflet)

The picture of a metaphyseal fracture of an infant’s wrist below comes from a 2000 paper on the orthopaedic aspects of child abuse by Kocher et al and published in the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (http://www.jaaos.org/content/8/1/10.abstract):

 

A spiral fracture refers to the direction in which the bone is fractured.  It implies that there has been a twisting force to cause the fracture. Spiral fractures can also occur accidentally in the femur once the child is walking. (Source: Core-info leaflet)

The picture below of a spiral fracture of the femur in a 2 month old comes from http://www.hawaii.edu/medicine/pediatrics/pemxray/v6c02.html (same website has a wealth of other paediatric radiological images on it if you are interested):

 

 

A supracondylar fracture is one in the upper arm immediately above the elbow and is highly suggestive of accidental injury.  The picture below comes from http://www.kidsfractures.com/, a site put together by 2 American orthopaedic surgeons who say their aim was to make parents’ experience of having a child with a broken bone a little less traumatic but I think much of the language and many of the pictures are more suited to a medical audience.

 

A simple linear skull fracture is a break in a cranial bone resembling a thin line, without splintering, depression, or distortion of bone.  They are equally prevalent in NAI and in accidental injury.  The picture below is of a linear right parietal skull fracture and comes from a Rumanian educational website, http://www.medandlife.ro/medandlife602.html.

 

This compares with a complex skull fracture which is variously defined as:

• a depressed fracture (where the skull is pushed in)

• two or more fractures of the skull

• fractures that cross the sutures (natural joining edges of skull bones) or those that are widening. (Source: Core-info leaflet)

The picture below of a complex skull fracture is from http://www.childabuseconsulting.com/child-abuse-fractures.html which houses other not-very-subtle images of non-accidental burns and bite marks as well.

 

Rib fractures in infants, particularly posterior ribs, with no history of major trauma are suspicious.  The picture below is taken from http://www.learningradiology.com/notes/bonenotes/childabusepage.htm and shows multiple rib fractures with callous formation, the ones of the left 2nd and 6th posterior ribs being the easiest to identify:

 

June 2012 PDF

June’s PDF digest is ready for consumption.  Both APLS and NICE have lost paraldehyde from their status epilepticus algorithms, a link to Working Together and an article on sticky eyes v. conjunctivitis.  Blood pressure centile charts and a plug for the London Deanery’s communication skills courses.  Do leave comments below.

The Perinatal Parent Infant Mental Health Service (PPIMHS)

The PPIMHS teams are made up of perinatal psychiatrists, community mental health practitioners and psychotherapists/psychologists and they accept referrals from Health Visitors, GPs, midwives, Children’s Centres workers or other health professionals and self-referrals.  Click here for their referral form.  They may signpost elsewhere after the initial consultation if appropriate or they will offer the parent/carer and infant/child 9-12 sessions to work on the parent-infant relationship and/or psychiatric support as required.

Groups particularly at risk of having problems with bonding include families with ex-premature babies who have spent a significant amount of time on the Special Care Baby Unit, those where the baby has feeding issues or is difficult to soothe, those where breastfeeding failed to establish and those where there was a traumatic birth or difficult conception and/or pregnancy.  Many of the parents on their case load have a personal history of disturbed attachments and are keen not to let history repeat itself.  A recent audit showed that 41% of their mothers had some sort of mental health diagnosis which means that 59% did not.  Click here for an information leaflet about their service that you might like to give to your patients.

Mums with postnatal depression or post-partum psychosis should be referred directly to PPIMHS.  Parents struggling with a crying baby or fussy toddler but with no bonding issues should be referred to their health visitor.  The PPIMHS team is a tier 3 (specialised) service concentrating primarily on the parent-infant relationship and perinatal mental health.

Symptoms in the baby that might suggest a bonding problem:

extreme clingy behaviours, fussy, difficult to soothe, abnormal self-soothing behaviours (eg. head-banging, hair-pulling, scratching), excessive sleep problems, extreme feeding problems, lack of verbal and non-verbal communication, stiff or floppy posture, extreme fearfulness or watchfulness, lack of interest in the world, no comfort sought from parents, avoids eye contact with parents, smiles very little.

Symptoms in the parent:

high anxiety and panic about the baby, excessive A and E or GP presentations, feeling frightened of harming the baby, lack of separation between parent and baby, baby never put down, excessive sterilising of bottles and toys, detached feelings about the baby, no pride in their development, anger about baby as if baby intends to upset the parent, feelings of failure as a parent, inability to cope.

There is some evidence around this issue and around maternal stress during pregnancy and the effect of high maternal cortisol levels on the foetus’ developing brain.  I have asked the Waltham Forest PPIMHS psychologists to write a bit about that and correct anything I have written about their service!

CPD sites pertinent to paediatrics

Dr Aimee Henderson (GPVTS) says of www.spottingthesickchild.com:

“Spottingthesickchild.com is a useful and easy to navigate online resource which I feel would mostly benefit those who have not had much experience in paediatrics before and who are of a more junior level. The site has a good range of the most common problems in children like abdominal pain and cough, and guides you through various points such as examination and communication. It has useful links to BTS and NICE guidelines.  I like the fact that you can monitor your progress in percentage of the site covered. There is also a test you can take (and certificate to print) when you feel you have looked through everything. The only downside is you need to make sure you are somewhere quiet as it is mostly video/audio heavy and you will need to be able to hear it.”

 

Dr Khalika Hasrat (GPVTS) says of the e-lfh safeguarding modules:

“I found the content of both modules useful, although module 2 was a little repetitive of the issues already raised in module 1. It was a good revision tool and the pictures helped emphasise the warning signs of abuse. The only criticism was that the MCQs were not always worded very clearly, but otherwise a valuable tool.”

Please do leave any other comments on these 2 sites below and especially if you have had a look at the Healthy child module in e-LFH.

GP’s July 2011

This month I have reproduced some immunisation myths and truths from Dr Ravindran’s excellent summary published in full somewhere on this blog (use the search function if you can’t find it below). NICE’s UTI guideline has just been reviewed; did you know there was a section called “Do not do recommendations”? Worth a look as we are all guilty of doing some of what we are not supposed to. Our new list of local breastfeeding drop-in groups is out, reduced unfortunately since the cutting back of Childrens centres’ funding. The GMC have clarified parental responsibility nicely and, as a step-parent myself, I was quite pleased to see the sensible point on the end too. Lastly, it is a bit depressing to be told that it takes 3 times longer in the UK for a child with a brain tumour to be diagnosed than in the US. Do leave comments below.